Back page
Solutions
Thank god it is not every day that I am faced with emails such as the following:
Hi All,
Few comments:
1. At this point…
4. I will look into the workflow and event-trigger on salesforce for auto-reply (and work with you all to provide the solution for the requirements). Also, in future, please feel free to let me know or discuss with me: a. about any issue/concern in regard to the salesforce-administration and b. before you change/update any configuration/setup on the salesforce production or sandbox
instance.
Thanks,
[redacted]
Because, if it was every day that I was faced with emails such as the above, I’d surely laugh myself straight into unemployment.
The author of this email is one of the many, I suspect, who work and may as well live in and around the tiny area of the world where I usually spend about 37 daytime hours of my week, that find it difficult to communicate in matter suitable to human beings. The malady is perhaps sadly understandable, but none the less really fucking depressing.
The author in question appeared to me, for the first few weeks or months I was exposed to him, prior to being seated beside him at an office outsideoftheoffice function, to be a simple and total loser who, I noted wore to the office every day without fail the most formal clothing he could get away with without looking like a total fool. He has continued to wear suit jackets and wool pants all summer, and doesn’t even take his jacket off in the office. He’s sweatier than normal, moves and speaks as if he is permanently just recently been punched stiffly in the back of the head, but at first seemed harmless and not altogether a bad guy.
On the fateful evening of the outsideoftheoffice function, this conception came tumbling down rather quickly. Sitting near the man for the duration of a meal, it became apparent that his manner of speaking was not simply stilted by office dynamics, as I would like to think mine is, the unclear and thus unstable hierarchical situation of the workplace, or the fact that most of the non work related talk around the office is decidedly small, but rather fully and fundamentally out of phase with anything resembling reality. The guy tried to explain naan to me. Like I don’t know what naan is. Inside the office the man only had only semi-coherent and, because work related, trivial things to say; outside of the office he had nothing.
From here, I began to pay sharper attention to his style of communication whenever I had the chance, which most weeks was only once or twice. Doing so it became clear that in our weekly full office update meetings I was not the only one who understood nothing of what the man said. Not only was his speech bogged down in jargon worse than most academic texts, which is saying something, unlike many such texts, nothing he said, we all seem pretty sure, meant anything at all. Imagine a poorly performing convenience store clerk, or anyone involved in an occupation requiring only a minimum of technically specific terminology, speaking about his job to a roomful of convenience store clerks as an engineer would, to other engineers. We all seem to chuckle inaudibly and invisibly as he goes on each week about the “reopen issue,” “customer solutions” and “moving forward.”
It is this last turn of phrase that has finally struck me as the ultimate distillation of this man’s business world traumatized style of speech. To excessively make use of a term such as “moving forward” the way our subject does – often using it as sentence in itself (“The development stage will hopefully start next week. Moving forward. We should have a solution in place by the end of the month.”) betrays a total misconception of time. For things, usually “projects,” to be “moving forward” the way our subject evidently perceives them to, there must be large spans of time where things are not “moving forward”. Here we come to picture of man for whom stasis is the normative state of the world. Without effort, without “solutions,” nothing happens, nothing moves. For anything to happen, our subject seems to think a significant and willed force must be applied, allowing them to begin forward motion.
How someone working where we work could think this way is beyond me – the strangulating preoccupation with movement and activity visible in midtown Manhattan, just as much as a picture of some stoner sitting on a couch, is enough to convince anyone that inertia rules over all. Rather than moving forward, most days, all I think about is drawing my brakes and stopping the whole damn thing in its tracks.
Remarks: 1 of 1
Remark · zbs · 29 August 2007
Yes, “moving forward” was the preferred transitional device in my last job. Though there, its usage had lost any relation at all with “projects” or anything else. “Moving forward” was considered a suitable component to connect any two sentences, and it and its siblings took the place of any logical connective language.
Accountable for this, or as a result of it, my workplace’s linguistic sophistication dwindled from an objective communication to a sort of primitive signaling. Emails built entirely from “moving forward” no longer had the capability to query or instruct — they were left only with the ability to indicate: their presence was equivalent with their content.